Music videos are watched not just by people wanting to listen to the song with some visuals but by people who want to see their favorite artists preforming in a video. This is why so many conventions go in to impress the audiences of these music video watches, in the past artists have behaved rebelliously in their music videos to attract the right audience have appeared in designer clothes driving nice cars and looking 'cool' so to say. This is all done for audience attraction and is carefully placed in a music video to attract the right kind of person. The sex appeal in music videos has been running for many years now and has featured woman wearing next to nothing dancing round in a sexual nature. This was first introduced in the late 70's to early 80's and has carried on throughout time and has got even more popular to this day with more and more artists containing a a lot of sex appeal in there music videos. This is all for audience satisfaction and is seen as a big selling point for a single and is why a lot of people like to view the music video in the first place.
Madonna - Material girl was released in 1984 and contains mild sexual references in the way she composes her self in the pink dress being carried around by men and dancing in a mild sexual nature.
As years have passed on the sexual nature of our music videos has got stronger and is a big reason why people watch the music video whether that be because they idolise the artist in what they are doing or because they just like to watch it. In Rhianna's music video for S&M you can see how much has changed when it comes to sex appeal in music videos and within the music industry.
For bigger artists such as Britiny Spears an average music video will cost around $500,000 to produce. This was the figure I found for her song 'you want a piece of me' which was popular back in late December 2007/early 2008. Other artists such as Kayne West with his song 'stronger' budgeted at a massive $1,200,000 to produce which is a lot of money for one music video which is designed purely to market and get money for the single by audiences buying it singularly or in the album.
It costs so much to create these music videos due to the high end equipment used. Camera's costing thousands of pounds and high level editing needs to be done. Produces may have to pay local councils to shut a road off to be able to film successfully with no traffic e.g. if it is in a city or a set may need to be created to make it look like the artists are in the place they are suppose to be posing in e.g. New York. High end producers and directors and other staff will all be high end and expensive due to their high end knowledge they have to be able to create the successful music video the audiences are expecting from the artist.
From this research I can see that the better quality the music video the better the sales of the single or album. Overall the more money spent the better the single will do which is why only a few artists get to be household names not only because of their singing but because of the quality of their music videos to get people to buy their music in the first place. It is like a fight to the top which is why there is only a small amount of artists or bands which are households names and have been for generations. Some of these names are artists like Madonna, Beyonce, Rhianna and Coldplay.